«Here» ist ein selbstgefälliges und langfädiges Werk, das seinem Publikum aggressiv seine Grusskartenweisheiten in Dialogform verfüttert. Die filmische Umsetzung des revolutionären Konzepts der Graphic Novel scheitert an einem laschen Skript, einer erdrückenden CGI-Verjüngung und einer visuellen Spielerei, die mehr erdrückt als fasziniert. Selbst die Schauspielgrössen Tom Hanks und Robin Wright können den Film nicht über seine Schwächen hinwegtragen. Ein Film, der sich seiner eigenen Genialität zu sicher ist und dabei die emotionale Wirkung verfehlt, die die Graphic Novel zu erreichen vermag.
Quelle: Maximum Cinema
“Here” Review: A Cinematic Journey Through Time
“Here,” directed by Robert Zemeckis and starring Tom Hanks and Robin Wright, takes audiences on a journey spanning millions of years in a comic adaptation that promises intrigue but delivers overwhelming kitsch. This film attempts to capture the essence of time and love but falls short of its lofty ambitions.
The Story So Far:
In “Here,” viewers are invited to witness a tale that transcends generations, as two souls navigate the complexities of life, love, and loss through the ages. As the narrative unfolds, we are taken on a rollercoaster of emotions, from heartwarming moments to profound revelations, all set against the backdrop of time itself.
Review:
Despite its grand scope and ambitious storytelling, “Here” struggles to find its footing, ultimately feeling like a contrived attempt at profundity. The characters, while played by talented actors, lack depth and substance, serving more as placeholders for generic diversity than fully realized individuals. The film’s attempt at exploring the complexities of life and love comes across as forced and artificial, leaving audiences with a sense of unfulfilled promise.
Zemeckis’ direction, while visually stunning at times, fails to elevate the material beyond its surface-level sentimentality. The film’s dialogue feels contrived and preachy, delivering trite wisdom in a heavy-handed manner that borders on self-indulgence. Overall, “Here” struggles to strike a balance between substance and style, ultimately falling short of its potential.
Conclusion:
“Here” may have lofty ambitions and a stellar cast, but it ultimately fails to deliver a cohesive and engaging narrative. While the film’s visuals are impressive and the performances commendable, the lack of depth in both character development and storytelling leaves much to be desired. In the end, “Here” comes across as a missed opportunity to explore profound themes in a meaningful and impactful way.
Frequently Asked Questions:
1. Is “Here” worth watching for its visual appeal alone?
– While “Here” boasts visually stunning moments, its substance may leave viewers wanting more.
2. Are Tom Hanks and Robin Wright able to elevate the material with their performances?
– Hanks and Wright deliver solid performances, but the material they work with falls short of showcasing their full potential.
3. Does “Here” offer a unique take on the concept of time and love?
– “Here” attempts to explore profound themes but struggles to do so in a meaningful and authentic way.
4. How does “Here” compare to other works by Robert Zemeckis?
– “Here” falls short of the director’s previous successes, lacking the depth and emotional resonance found in his better-known films.
5. What aspect of “Here” stands out the most to viewers?
– The visual aesthetics of “Here” are undeniably striking, but they are not enough to compensate for the film’s shortcomings in other areas.
6. Does “Here” offer any redeeming qualities for audiences?
– While “Here” may not live up to expectations, it still has moments of emotional resonance that may resonate with some viewers.
7. What audience is “Here” best suited for?
– Fans of romantic dramas and visually-driven storytelling may find aspects of “Here” appealing, despite its narrative flaws.
8. How does “Here” handle the concept of diversity and inclusion?
– “Here” attempts to showcase diversity through its characters, but ultimately falls short in providing them with depth and complexity.
9. Are there any standout moments in “Here” that make it memorable?
– While “Here” has moments of visual splendor, its lack of cohesive storytelling may diminish its lasting impact on audiences.
10. Overall, what is the verdict on “Here” for potential viewers?
– “Here” may intrigue with its premise and star-studded cast, but it ultimately fails to deliver a compelling and engaging cinematic experience.
Tags:
“Here” movie review, Robert Zemeckis, Tom Hanks, Robin Wright, cinematic journey, time-travel, romantic drama, visual aesthetics, storytelling shortcomings, character development, film critique. “Stranger Things: A Nostalgic Journey into 80s Pop Culture”
The article discusses how the Netflix series “Stranger Things” has captured the hearts of viewers with its nostalgic nods to 80s pop culture. The author praises the show for its well-crafted storyline, engaging characters, and suspenseful plot twists.
The article also highlights the performances of the young cast members, particularly Millie Bobby Brown as Eleven and Finn Wolfhard as Mike. The author notes that the chemistry between the kids is one of the show’s strongest points, adding to the authenticity and charm of the series.
Overall, the review is positive, describing “Stranger Things” as a must-watch for fans of sci-fi, horror, and coming-of-age stories. The author concludes by recommending the show to anyone looking for a thrilling and nostalgic trip back to the 80s.
Overall, the review is informative and well-written, providing readers with a clear understanding of the show’s appeal and strengths.